Antigua and Barbuda vs Kenya: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score

Antigua and Barbuda
80.22
in 2019
Kenya
79.83
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
78th
Kenya rank
79th

Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Kenya
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 80.22 against 79.83 in Kenya, a difference of 0.39.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 78th and Kenya ranks 79th of 188 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Kenya Difference Ahead
2000s 77.71 41.73 35.98 Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 76.74 66.64 10.1 Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Kenya?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 80.22 against 79.83 in Kenya as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Kenya?
0.39, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Kenya?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Kenya rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 78th and Kenya ranks 79th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.