Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of vs Jamaica: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
65.84
in 2019
Jamaica
66.15
in 2019
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of rank
141st
Jamaica rank
140th
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time
- Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
- Jamaica
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 66.15 against 65.84 in Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 0.31.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ahead.
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ranks 141st and Jamaica ranks 140th of 190 countries.
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.07 | 57.5 | 7.57 | Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of |
| 2010s | 65.22 | 63.59 | 1.64 | Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of or Jamaica?
- Jamaica, at 66.15 against 65.84 in Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and Jamaica?
- 0.31, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and Jamaica?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and Jamaica rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
- Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ranks 141st and Jamaica ranks 140th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.