Syrian Arab Republic vs Taiwan Province of China: Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Syrian Arab Republic
92.2
in 2019
Taiwan Province of China
92.21
in 2019
Syrian Arab Republic rank
32nd
Taiwan Province of China rank
31st
Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Syrian Arab Republic
- Taiwan Province of China
How they compare
Taiwan Province of China currently reports 92.21 against 92.2 in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 0.01.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Taiwan Province of China has been ahead every year.
Syrian Arab Republic ranks 32nd and Taiwan Province of China ranks 31st of 182 countries.
Taiwan Province of China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score, Syrian Arab Republic or Taiwan Province of China?
- Taiwan Province of China, at 92.21 against 92.2 in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score between Syrian Arab Republic and Taiwan Province of China?
- 0.01, with Taiwan Province of China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Syrian Arab Republic and Taiwan Province of China?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Syrian Arab Republic and Taiwan Province of China rank globally for paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Syrian Arab Republic ranks 32nd and Taiwan Province of China ranks 31st of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for postfiling index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.