South Africa vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- South Africa
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 63.89 against 60.79 in South Africa, a difference of 3.1.
That makes Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has been ahead every year.
South Africa ranks 91st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 88th of 183 countries.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score, South Africa or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 63.89 against 60.79 in South Africa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score between South Africa and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 3.1, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do South Africa and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- South Africa ranks 91st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 88th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for postfiling index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.