Papua New Guinea vs Poland: Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Papua New Guinea
78.52
in 2019
Poland
77.36
in 2019
Papua New Guinea rank
62nd
Poland rank
64th
Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Poland
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 78.52 against 77.36 in Poland, a difference of 1.16.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Poland ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 62nd and Poland ranks 64th of 182 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score, Papua New Guinea or Poland?
- Papua New Guinea, at 78.52 against 77.36 in Poland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score between Papua New Guinea and Poland?
- 1.16, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Poland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Poland rank globally for paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 62nd and Poland ranks 64th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for postfiling index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.