New Zealand vs South Sudan: Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
New Zealand
96.9
in 2019
South Sudan
95.87
in 2019
New Zealand rank
12th
South Sudan rank
14th
Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- New Zealand
- South Sudan
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 96.9 against 95.87 in South Sudan, a difference of 1.03.
Across all 5 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 12th and South Sudan ranks 14th of 183 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score, New Zealand or South Sudan?
- New Zealand, at 96.9 against 95.87 in South Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score between New Zealand and South Sudan?
- 1.03, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and South Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and South Sudan rank globally for paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- New Zealand ranks 12th and South Sudan ranks 14th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for postfiling index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.