Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Trinidad and Tobago: Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Lao People's Democratic Republic
18.57
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
19.5
in 2019
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
168th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
165th
Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 19.5 against 18.57 in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 0.93.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 168th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 165th of 183 countries.
Lao People's Democratic Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 19.5 against 18.57 in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.93, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 168th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 165th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for postfiling index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.