Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Puerto Rico: Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 18.57 against 13.76 in Puerto Rico, a difference of 4.81.
That makes Lao People's Democratic Republic's figure about 1.3 times Puerto Rico's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Lao People's Democratic Republic has been ahead every year.
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 167th and Puerto Rico ranks 170th of 182 countries.
Lao People's Democratic Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Puerto Rico?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 18.57 against 13.76 in Puerto Rico as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Puerto Rico?
- 4.81, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Puerto Rico?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Puerto Rico rank globally for paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 167th and Puerto Rico ranks 170th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for postfiling index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.