Kazakhstan, Republic of vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Kazakhstan, Republic of
48.85
in 2019
Tanzania, United Republic of
48.39
in 2019
Kazakhstan, Republic of rank
123rd
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
125th
Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Kazakhstan, Republic of
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Kazakhstan, Republic of currently reports 48.85 against 48.39 in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.46.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Kazakhstan, Republic of has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan, Republic of ranks 123rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 125th of 182 countries.
Kazakhstan, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score, Kazakhstan, Republic of or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Kazakhstan, Republic of, at 48.85 against 48.39 in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score between Kazakhstan, Republic of and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0.46, with Kazakhstan, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan, Republic of and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Kazakhstan, Republic of and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Kazakhstan, Republic of ranks 123rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 125th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for postfiling index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.