Jamaica vs Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of): Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Jamaica
19.68
in 2019
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
19.72
in 2019
Jamaica rank
163rd
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) rank
162nd
Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Jamaica
- Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
How they compare
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) currently reports 19.72 against 19.68 in Jamaica, a difference of 0.04.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) has been ahead every year.
Jamaica ranks 163rd and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) ranks 162nd of 182 countries.
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score, Jamaica or Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)?
- Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of), at 19.72 against 19.68 in Jamaica as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score between Jamaica and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)?
- 0.04, with Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Jamaica and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) rank globally for paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Jamaica ranks 163rd and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) ranks 162nd of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for postfiling index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.