Ireland vs South Korea: Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Ireland
93.43
in 2019
South Korea
93.93
in 2019
Ireland rank
23rd
South Korea rank
21st

Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Ireland
  • South Korea
020406080100201520172019

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 93.93 against 93.43 in Ireland, a difference of 0.5.

Across all 5 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.

Ireland ranks 23rd and South Korea ranks 21st of 180 countries.

South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score, Ireland or South Korea?
South Korea, at 93.93 against 93.43 in Ireland as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score between Ireland and South Korea?
0.5, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and South Korea?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Ireland and South Korea rank globally for paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Ireland ranks 23rd and South Korea ranks 21st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
182 places, 910 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for postfiling index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.