Iraq vs Venezuela, República Bolivariana de: Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Iraq
21.43
in 2019
Venezuela, República Bolivariana de
19.72
in 2019
Iraq rank
160th
Venezuela, República Bolivariana de rank
162nd
Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Iraq
- Venezuela, República Bolivariana de
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 21.43 against 19.72 in Venezuela, República Bolivariana de, a difference of 1.71.
That makes Iraq's figure about 1.1 times Venezuela, República Bolivariana de's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Iraq has been ahead every year.
Iraq ranks 160th and Venezuela, República Bolivariana de ranks 162nd of 182 countries.
Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score, Iraq or Venezuela, República Bolivariana de?
- Iraq, at 21.43 against 19.72 in Venezuela, República Bolivariana de as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score between Iraq and Venezuela, República Bolivariana de?
- 1.71, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Venezuela, República Bolivariana de?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Iraq and Venezuela, República Bolivariana de rank globally for paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Iraq ranks 160th and Venezuela, República Bolivariana de ranks 162nd of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for postfiling index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.