Guyana vs North Macedonia: Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Guyana
54.24
in 2019
North Macedonia
56.36
in 2019
Guyana rank
96th
North Macedonia rank
95th

Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Guyana
  • North Macedonia
0204060201520172019

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 56.36 against 54.24 in Guyana, a difference of 2.12.

Across all 5 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.

Guyana ranks 96th and North Macedonia ranks 95th of 180 countries.

North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score, Guyana or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at 56.36 against 54.24 in Guyana as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score between Guyana and North Macedonia?
2.12, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and North Macedonia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Guyana and North Macedonia rank globally for paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Guyana ranks 96th and North Macedonia ranks 95th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
182 places, 910 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for postfiling index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.