Guinea-Bissau vs Myanmar: Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Guinea-Bissau
46.26
in 2019
Myanmar
45.54
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau rank
135th
Myanmar rank
136th

Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Myanmar
01020304050201520172019

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 46.26 against 45.54 in Myanmar, a difference of 0.72.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 135th and Myanmar ranks 136th of 180 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score, Guinea-Bissau or Myanmar?
Guinea-Bissau, at 46.26 against 45.54 in Myanmar as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score between Guinea-Bissau and Myanmar?
0.72, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Myanmar?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Myanmar rank globally for paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 135th and Myanmar ranks 136th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
182 places, 910 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for postfiling index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.