Estonia vs Hong Kong, China: Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Estonia
99.38
in 2019
Hong Kong, China
98.85
in 2019
Estonia rank
3rd
Hong Kong, China rank
4th
Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Estonia
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 99.38 against 98.85 in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.53.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 3rd and Hong Kong, China ranks 4th of 183 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score, Estonia or Hong Kong, China?
- Estonia, at 99.38 against 98.85 in Hong Kong, China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score between Estonia and Hong Kong, China?
- 0.53, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Hong Kong, China?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Estonia and Hong Kong, China rank globally for paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Estonia ranks 3rd and Hong Kong, China ranks 4th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for postfiling index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.