Cote d'Ivoire vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Cote d'Ivoire
64.82
in 2019
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
63.89
in 2019
Cote d'Ivoire rank
86th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
88th
Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 64.82 against 63.89 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.93.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 86th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 88th of 183 countries.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score, Cote d'Ivoire or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Cote d'Ivoire, at 64.82 against 63.89 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score between Cote d'Ivoire and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0.93, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 86th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 88th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for postfiling index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.