Congo vs Dominican Republic: Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Congo
12.29
in 2019
Dominican Republic
10.71
in 2019
Congo rank
172nd
Dominican Republic rank
173rd

Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Congo
  • Dominican Republic
02.557.51012.5201520172019

How they compare

Congo currently reports 12.29 against 10.71 in Dominican Republic, a difference of 1.58.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Dominican Republic's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 172nd and Dominican Republic ranks 173rd of 180 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score, Congo or Dominican Republic?
Congo, at 12.29 against 10.71 in Dominican Republic as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score between Congo and Dominican Republic?
1.58, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Dominican Republic?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Congo and Dominican Republic rank globally for paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Congo ranks 172nd and Dominican Republic ranks 173rd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
182 places, 910 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for postfiling index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.