Democratic Republic of Congo vs Lebanon: Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Democratic Republic of Congo
27.08
in 2019
Lebanon
27.48
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
152nd
Lebanon rank
151st

Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Lebanon
0102030201520172019

How they compare

Lebanon currently reports 27.48 against 27.08 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.4.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Lebanon has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 152nd and Lebanon ranks 151st of 180 countries.

Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Lebanon?
Lebanon, at 27.48 against 27.08 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Lebanon?
0.4, with Lebanon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Lebanon?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Lebanon rank globally for paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 152nd and Lebanon ranks 151st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
182 places, 910 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for postfiling index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.