CAN vs CYP: Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
CAN
73.23
in 2019
CYP
74.47
in 2019
CAN rank
73rd
CYP rank
70th
Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- CAN
- CYP
How they compare
CYP currently reports 74.47 against 73.23 in CAN, a difference of 1.24.
Across all 5 years both countries report, CYP has been ahead every year.
CAN ranks 73rd and CYP ranks 70th of 180 countries.
CYP has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score, CAN or CYP?
- CYP, at 74.47 against 73.23 in CAN as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score between CAN and CYP?
- 1.24, with CYP ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for CAN and CYP?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do CAN and CYP rank globally for paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- CAN ranks 73rd and CYP ranks 70th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for postfiling index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.