Australia vs Sierra Leone: Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Australia
95.34
in 2019
Sierra Leone
95.41
in 2019
Australia rank
16th
Sierra Leone rank
15th

Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Australia
  • Sierra Leone
020406080100201520172019

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 95.41 against 95.34 in Australia, a difference of 0.07.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Sierra Leone has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 16th and Sierra Leone ranks 15th of 180 countries.

Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score, Australia or Sierra Leone?
Sierra Leone, at 95.41 against 95.34 in Australia as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score between Australia and Sierra Leone?
0.07, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Sierra Leone?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Australia and Sierra Leone rank globally for paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Australia ranks 16th and Sierra Leone ranks 15th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
182 places, 910 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for postfiling index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.