Australia vs Bhutan: Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Australia
95.34
in 2019
Bhutan
95.04
in 2019
Australia rank
16th
Bhutan rank
18th
Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Australia
- Bhutan
How they compare
Australia currently reports 95.34 against 95.04 in Bhutan, a difference of 0.3.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Bhutan ahead.
Australia ranks 16th and Bhutan ranks 18th of 180 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score, Australia or Bhutan?
- Australia, at 95.34 against 95.04 in Bhutan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score between Australia and Bhutan?
- 0.3, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Bhutan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Bhutan rank globally for paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Australia ranks 16th and Bhutan ranks 18th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for postfiling index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.