Syrian Arab Republic vs Uruguay: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Syrian Arab Republic
71.67
in 2019
Uruguay
71.67
in 2019
Syrian Arab Republic rank
98th
Uruguay rank
98th
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time
- Syrian Arab Republic
- Uruguay
How they compare
Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 71.67 against 71.67 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
Syrian Arab Republic ranks 98th and Uruguay ranks 98th of 190 countries.
Syrian Arab Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Syrian Arab Republic | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.67 | 15.33 | 56.33 | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2010s | 71.67 | 52.67 | 19 | Syrian Arab Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Syrian Arab Republic or Uruguay?
- Syrian Arab Republic, at 71.67 against 71.67 in Uruguay as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Syrian Arab Republic and Uruguay?
- 0, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Syrian Arab Republic and Uruguay?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Syrian Arab Republic and Uruguay rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
- Syrian Arab Republic ranks 98th and Uruguay ranks 98th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.