Singapore vs United Arab Emirates: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Singapore
96.67
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
96.67
in 2019
Singapore rank
5th
United Arab Emirates rank
5th
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time
- Singapore
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 96.67 against 96.67 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Singapore ahead.
Singapore ranks 5th and United Arab Emirates ranks 5th of 191 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Singapore | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.33 | 81.67 | 14.67 | Singapore |
| 2010s | 95.67 | 94.83 | 0.8334 | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Singapore or United Arab Emirates?
- Singapore, at 96.67 against 96.67 in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Singapore and United Arab Emirates?
- 0, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and United Arab Emirates?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Singapore and United Arab Emirates rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
- Singapore ranks 5th and United Arab Emirates ranks 5th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.