Sierra Leone vs Solomon Islands: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Sierra Leone
48.33
in 2019
Solomon Islands
48.33
in 2019
Sierra Leone rank
139th
Solomon Islands rank
139th
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time
- Sierra Leone
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 48.33 against 48.33 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Sierra Leone ranks 139th and Solomon Islands ranks 139th of 191 countries.
Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sierra Leone | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.67 | 48.33 | 8.33 | Sierra Leone |
| 2010s | 49.83 | 48.33 | 1.5 | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Sierra Leone or Solomon Islands?
- Sierra Leone, at 48.33 against 48.33 in Solomon Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Sierra Leone and Solomon Islands?
- 0, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Solomon Islands?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Sierra Leone and Solomon Islands rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
- Sierra Leone ranks 139th and Solomon Islands ranks 139th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.