Senegal vs Zimbabwe: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score

Senegal
16.67
in 2019
Zimbabwe
20
in 2019
Senegal rank
180th
Zimbabwe rank
178th

Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time

  • Senegal
  • Zimbabwe
5101520200520122019

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 20 against 16.67 in Senegal, a difference of 3.33.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Senegal's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Senegal ranks 180th and Zimbabwe ranks 178th of 188 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Senegal Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 6.67 17.33 10.67 Zimbabwe
2010s 8.5 20 11.5 Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Senegal or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 20 against 16.67 in Senegal as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Senegal and Zimbabwe?
3.33, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Senegal and Zimbabwe?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Senegal and Zimbabwe rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
Senegal ranks 180th and Zimbabwe ranks 178th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.