Philippines vs Romania: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score

Philippines
83.33
in 2019
Romania
81.67
in 2019
Philippines rank
77th
Romania rank
78th

Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time

  • Philippines
  • Romania
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 83.33 against 81.67 in Romania, a difference of 1.66.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Philippines ahead.

Philippines ranks 77th and Romania ranks 78th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines Romania Difference Ahead
2000s 26 0 26 Philippines
2010s 51.67 56.67 5 Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Philippines or Romania?
Philippines, at 83.33 against 81.67 in Romania as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Philippines and Romania?
1.66, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Romania?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Philippines and Romania rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
Philippines ranks 77th and Romania ranks 78th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.