Papua New Guinea vs Yemen: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Papua New Guinea
30
in 2019
Yemen
31.67
in 2019
Papua New Guinea rank
169th
Yemen rank
167th
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Yemen
How they compare
Yemen currently reports 31.67 against 30 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 1.67.
That makes Yemen's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 169th and Yemen ranks 167th of 191 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.33 | 31.67 | 19.67 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 48.33 | 31.67 | 16.67 | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Papua New Guinea or Yemen?
- Yemen, at 31.67 against 30 in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Papua New Guinea and Yemen?
- 1.67, with Yemen ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Yemen?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Yemen rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 169th and Yemen ranks 167th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.