Nepal vs Sao Tome and Principe: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Nepal
28.33
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
28.33
in 2019
Nepal rank
171st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
171st
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time
- Nepal
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 28.33 against 28.33 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Nepal ahead.
Nepal ranks 171st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 171st of 191 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48.33 | 34.67 | 13.67 | Nepal |
| 2010s | 45.5 | 28.33 | 17.17 | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Nepal or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Nepal, at 28.33 against 28.33 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Nepal and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Nepal and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
- Nepal ranks 171st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 171st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.