Marshall Islands vs Russian Federation: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Marshall Islands
90
in 2019
Russian Federation
90
in 2019
Marshall Islands rank
40th
Russian Federation rank
40th
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time
- Marshall Islands
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 90 against 90 in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Marshall Islands ranks 40th and Russian Federation ranks 40th of 191 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90 | 90.33 | 0.3334 | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 90 | 90.17 | 0.1667 | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Marshall Islands or Russian Federation?
- Marshall Islands, at 90 against 90 in Russian Federation as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Marshall Islands and Russian Federation?
- 0, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Russian Federation?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Marshall Islands and Russian Federation rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
- Marshall Islands ranks 40th and Russian Federation ranks 40th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.