Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Malawi: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Lao People's Democratic Republic
46.67
in 2019
Malawi
46.67
in 2019
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
142nd
Malawi rank
142nd
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
- Malawi
How they compare
Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 46.67 against 46.67 in Malawi, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Malawi ahead.
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 142nd and Malawi ranks 142nd of 190 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lao People's Democratic Republic | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48.33 | 66.67 | 18.33 | Malawi |
| 2010s | 47.33 | 51.5 | 4.17 | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Malawi?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 46.67 against 46.67 in Malawi as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Malawi?
- 0, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Malawi?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Malawi rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 142nd and Malawi ranks 142nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.