Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Lithuania: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
88.33
in 2019
Lithuania
88.33
in 2019
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
55th
Lithuania rank
55th
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- Lithuania
How they compare
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) currently reports 88.33 against 88.33 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Lithuania ahead.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 55th and Lithuania ranks 55th of 191 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 85 | 35 | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 65.5 | 87 | 21.5 | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) or Lithuania?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), at 88.33 against 88.33 in Lithuania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Lithuania?
- 0, with Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Lithuania?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Lithuania rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 55th and Lithuania ranks 55th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.