Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Lebanon: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Iran, Islamic Republic of
71.67
in 2019
Lebanon
71.67
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
99th
Lebanon rank
99th
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
- Lebanon
How they compare
Iran, Islamic Republic of currently reports 71.67 against 71.67 in Lebanon, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Lebanon has been ahead every year.
Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 99th and Lebanon ranks 99th of 191 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran, Islamic Republic of | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.33 | 71.67 | 3.33 | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 71.67 | 71.67 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Iran, Islamic Republic of or Lebanon?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of, at 71.67 against 71.67 in Lebanon as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Iran, Islamic Republic of and Lebanon?
- 0, with Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran, Islamic Republic of and Lebanon?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Iran, Islamic Republic of and Lebanon rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 99th and Lebanon ranks 99th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.