Ghana vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Ghana
45
in 2019
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
45
in 2019
Ghana rank
150th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
150th
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time
- Ghana
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 45 against 45 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
Ghana ranks 150th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 150th of 191 countries.
Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.33 | 45 | 2.33 | Ghana |
| 2010s | 51 | 45 | 6 | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Ghana or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Ghana, at 45 against 45 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Ghana and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Ghana and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
- Ghana ranks 150th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 150th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.