Germany vs Netherlands: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score

Germany
90
in 2019
Netherlands
90
in 2019
Germany rank
40th
Netherlands rank
40th

Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time

  • Germany
  • Netherlands
020406080100200520122019

How they compare

Germany currently reports 90 against 90 in Netherlands, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Germany ahead.

Germany ranks 40th and Netherlands ranks 40th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Germany averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Netherlands Difference Ahead
2000s 85 82.67 2.33 Germany
2010s 89 90 1 Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Germany or Netherlands?
Germany, at 90 against 90 in Netherlands as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Germany and Netherlands?
0, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Netherlands?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Germany and Netherlands rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
Germany ranks 40th and Netherlands ranks 40th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.