Ethiopia vs Palestine, State of: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Ethiopia
56.67
in 2019
Palestine, State of
58.33
in 2019
Ethiopia rank
119th
Palestine, State of rank
117th
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time
- Ethiopia
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Palestine, State of currently reports 58.33 against 56.67 in Ethiopia, a difference of 1.66.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 119th and Palestine, State of ranks 117th of 191 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.67 | 40 | 16.67 | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 56.67 | 51 | 5.67 | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Ethiopia or Palestine, State of?
- Palestine, State of, at 58.33 against 56.67 in Ethiopia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Ethiopia and Palestine, State of?
- 1.66, with Palestine, State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Palestine, State of?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Ethiopia and Palestine, State of rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
- Ethiopia ranks 119th and Palestine, State of ranks 117th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.