Eswatini vs Lesotho: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score

Eswatini
50
in 2019
Lesotho
51.67
in 2019
Eswatini rank
129th
Lesotho rank
128th

Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time

  • Eswatini
  • Lesotho
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 51.67 against 50 in Eswatini, a difference of 1.67.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Lesotho has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 129th and Lesotho ranks 128th of 188 countries.

Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Lesotho Difference Ahead
2000s 50 50.67 0.6667 Lesotho
2010s 50 51.67 1.67 Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Eswatini or Lesotho?
Lesotho, at 51.67 against 50 in Eswatini as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Eswatini and Lesotho?
1.67, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Lesotho?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Eswatini and Lesotho rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
Eswatini ranks 129th and Lesotho ranks 128th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.