Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Equatorial Guinea
28.33
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
28.33
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
171st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
171st
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 28.33 against 28.33 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 171st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 171st of 191 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.33 | 34.67 | 6.33 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 28.33 | 28.33 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 28.33 against 28.33 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 171st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 171st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.