Dominican Republic vs North Macedonia: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Dominican Republic
93.33
in 2019
North Macedonia
93.33
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
16th
North Macedonia rank
16th
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time
- Dominican Republic
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 93.33 against 93.33 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 16th and North Macedonia ranks 16th of 191 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.67 | 36.33 | 1.33 | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 93.33 | 75 | 18.33 | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Dominican Republic or North Macedonia?
- Dominican Republic, at 93.33 against 93.33 in North Macedonia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Dominican Republic and North Macedonia?
- 0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and North Macedonia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Dominican Republic and North Macedonia rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
- Dominican Republic ranks 16th and North Macedonia ranks 16th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.