Dominican Republic vs New Zealand: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Dominican Republic
93.33
in 2019
New Zealand
93.33
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
16th
New Zealand rank
16th
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time
- Dominican Republic
- New Zealand
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 93.33 against 93.33 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was New Zealand ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 16th and New Zealand ranks 16th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.67 | 91.67 | 54 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 93.33 | 92.33 | 1 | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Dominican Republic or New Zealand?
- Dominican Republic, at 93.33 against 93.33 in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Dominican Republic and New Zealand?
- 0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and New Zealand?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Dominican Republic and New Zealand rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
- Dominican Republic ranks 16th and New Zealand ranks 16th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.