Costa Rica vs Republic of Moldova: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Costa Rica
88.33
in 2019
Republic of Moldova
88.33
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
55th
Republic of Moldova rank
55th
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time
- Costa Rica
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 88.33 against 88.33 in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 55th and Republic of Moldova ranks 55th of 191 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.33 | 18 | 15.33 | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 72.17 | 61.5 | 10.67 | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Costa Rica or Republic of Moldova?
- Costa Rica, at 88.33 against 88.33 in Republic of Moldova as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Costa Rica and Republic of Moldova?
- 0, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Republic of Moldova?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Costa Rica and Republic of Moldova rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
- Costa Rica ranks 55th and Republic of Moldova ranks 55th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.