Costa Rica vs Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Costa Rica
88.33
in 2019
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
88.33
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
55th
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
55th
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time
- Costa Rica
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 88.33 against 88.33 in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 55th and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 55th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.33 | 50 | 16.67 | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
| 2010s | 72.17 | 65.5 | 6.67 | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Costa Rica or Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- Costa Rica, at 88.33 against 88.33 in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Costa Rica and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 0, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Costa Rica and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
- Costa Rica ranks 55th and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 55th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.