Congo vs Nigeria: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score

Congo
21.67
in 2019
Nigeria
25
in 2019
Congo rank
176th
Nigeria rank
173rd

Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time

  • Congo
  • Nigeria
510152025200520122019

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 25 against 21.67 in Congo, a difference of 3.33.

That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Nigeria ahead.

Congo ranks 176th and Nigeria ranks 173rd of 188 countries.

Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Nigeria Difference Ahead
2000s 3.33 26.67 23.33 Nigeria
2010s 16.5 20.83 4.33 Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Congo or Nigeria?
Nigeria, at 25 against 21.67 in Congo as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Congo and Nigeria?
3.33, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Nigeria?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Congo and Nigeria rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
Congo ranks 176th and Nigeria ranks 173rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.