Democratic Republic of Congo vs Zimbabwe: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 20 against 18.33 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 1.67.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 179th and Zimbabwe ranks 178th of 188 countries.
Democratic Republic of Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.33 | 17.33 | 21 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
| 2010s | 26.67 | 20 | 6.67 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 20 against 18.33 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Zimbabwe?
- 1.67, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Zimbabwe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 179th and Zimbabwe ranks 178th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.