Colombia vs Lithuania: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score

Colombia
88.33
in 2019
Lithuania
88.33
in 2019
Colombia rank
55th
Lithuania rank
55th

Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time

  • Colombia
  • Lithuania
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 88.33 against 88.33 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Lithuania ahead.

Colombia ranks 55th and Lithuania ranks 55th of 188 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s 24.33 85.67 61.33 Lithuania
2010s 85.33 87 1.67 Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Colombia or Lithuania?
Colombia, at 88.33 against 88.33 in Lithuania as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Colombia and Lithuania?
0, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Lithuania?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Colombia and Lithuania rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
Colombia ranks 55th and Lithuania ranks 55th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.