Chad vs Senegal: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score

Chad
15
in 2019
Senegal
16.67
in 2019
Chad rank
181st
Senegal rank
180th

Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time

  • Chad
  • Senegal
051015200520122019

How they compare

Senegal currently reports 16.67 against 15 in Chad, a difference of 1.67.

That makes Senegal's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 181st and Senegal ranks 180th of 188 countries.

Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Senegal Difference Ahead
2000s 15 6.67 8.33 Chad
2010s 15 8.5 6.5 Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Chad or Senegal?
Senegal, at 16.67 against 15 in Chad as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Chad and Senegal?
1.67, with Senegal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Senegal?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Chad and Senegal rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
Chad ranks 181st and Senegal ranks 180th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.