Central African Republic vs Chad: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Central African Republic
11.67
in 2019
Chad
15
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
185th
Chad rank
183rd
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Chad
How they compare
Chad currently reports 15 against 11.67 in Central African Republic, a difference of 3.33.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.3 times Central African Republic's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 185th and Chad ranks 183rd of 190 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12 | 15 | 3 | Chad |
| 2010s | 12.33 | 15 | 2.67 | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Central African Republic or Chad?
- Chad, at 15 against 11.67 in Central African Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Central African Republic and Chad?
- 3.33, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Chad?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Chad rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
- Central African Republic ranks 185th and Chad ranks 183rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.