Canada vs Ecuador: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score

Canada
91.67
in 2019
Ecuador
91.67
in 2019
Canada rank
27th
Ecuador rank
27th

Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time

  • Canada
  • Ecuador
020406080100200520122019

How they compare

Canada currently reports 91.67 against 91.67 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Ecuador ahead.

Canada ranks 27th and Ecuador ranks 27th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Ecuador Difference Ahead
2000s 90 91.67 1.67 Ecuador
2010s 91.67 91.33 0.3333 Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Canada or Ecuador?
Canada, at 91.67 against 91.67 in Ecuador as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Canada and Ecuador?
0, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Ecuador?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Canada and Ecuador rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
Canada ranks 27th and Ecuador ranks 27th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.