Cameroon vs Papua New Guinea: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Cameroon
31.67
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
30
in 2019
Cameroon rank
167th
Papua New Guinea rank
169th
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time
- Cameroon
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 31.67 against 30 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 1.67.
That makes Cameroon's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Cameroon ranks 167th and Papua New Guinea ranks 169th of 191 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.33 | 51.33 | 21 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 31.67 | 48.33 | 16.67 | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Cameroon or Papua New Guinea?
- Cameroon, at 31.67 against 30 in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Cameroon and Papua New Guinea?
- 1.67, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Papua New Guinea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Cameroon and Papua New Guinea rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
- Cameroon ranks 167th and Papua New Guinea ranks 169th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.