Cambodia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Cambodia
38.33
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
40
in 2019
Cambodia rank
161st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
159th
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time
- Cambodia
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 40 against 38.33 in Cambodia, a difference of 1.67.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cambodia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 161st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 159th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40 | 38.33 | 1.67 | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 38.67 | 39.83 | 1.17 | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Cambodia or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 40 against 38.33 in Cambodia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Cambodia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 1.67, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Cambodia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
- Cambodia ranks 161st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 159th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.