Cambodia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Cambodia
38.33
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
40
in 2019
Cambodia rank
161st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
159th
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time
- Cambodia
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 40 against 38.33 in Cambodia, a difference of 1.67.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Cambodia ranks 161st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 159th of 191 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40 | 59.33 | 19.33 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 38.67 | 42 | 3.33 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Cambodia or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 40 against 38.33 in Cambodia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Cambodia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 1.67, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Cambodia and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
- Cambodia ranks 161st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 159th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.